deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
more ▶

Featured in Groups:

Details

January 18, 2011
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 72
Favourites: 0
Views: 135 (0 today)
[x]

What do you like in CHARACTERS? (EDIT)

Journal Entry: Tue Jan 18, 2011, 7:52 PM
Livejournal. | Tumblr. | Hölle Kings.

I'm working on character designs for a new webcomic. >D

Photobucket
Photobucket

I'm still in the conceptual process, still working out the colors and characterizations...

You KNOWWWW, I'm noticing a trend in my work process. It's also there when I'm looking at other people's works.

When I'm making characters, I like to give them little quirks as soon as possible. But they have to be realistic and not cliched. I'm constantly judging characters I see by how interesting (but realistic) their characterizations are with this viewpoint.

I also like to rate them on a level of selfishness. In my opinion, nothing drives a person forward quite like selfishness. In fact, most of my characters are very selfish. Shh! Don't judge Emruki! D<

Most of all, I always give each character a couple of redeeming qualities, both in terms of personality and appearance. Lately, it seems that everyone wants to load as many flaws as they can on a character, but I like characters who like themselves. Everyone has something attractive about them; whether it shines through their flaws is up to the beholder, right?

With that said, what do you guys like to see in characters? What makes you think, "This character is really well-rounded!" or "I just like this guy." What makes a character relate to you?

Or maybe, what do you HATE to see in characters? XD Mary-Sue girls? Hyperactive adolescents with stupid catch phrases? What just pisses you off so much that you can't possibly keep reading or watching the story? >D

Seriously, guys. I want to know. 'Cause well, I can't deny that your opinions my influence my new characters in their conceptual stages. :heart:

EDIT: I'm loving the comments you guys are leaving~ so thoughtful! <3 I also found a nifty character design check list I put away in my favorites a while ago. I think it's quite useful:


Add a Comment:
 
:iconk-kaito:
~K-Kaito Jan 20, 2011  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Truthfully, I don't understand the concept of "realistic" or "mary sue". Those are all pretty vague definitions.
So a realistic character acts like a real person. Sweet. How does a real person act? Well, that depends a lot on the environment, I assume.
A real person, in my typical environment, has no opinion on whatsoever and no field of interests. They only ever talk about "Life", not in a philosophical way, but as in what they did at work/ that gathering with friends/ that school project.

Applying this, I guess I like unrealistic characters. I like it when they have opinions on politics and the world around them - no matter if said opinions are cynical or idealistic - and act on them to change the world to their own liking. Also when they have fields of interest. Learning through them is fun, but if they turn into "Mr. Exposition" it's skipping time.

On the same level, I wouldn't care to read about a character's job/gatherings/projects unless they work as, let's say, assassin/detective; or the gathering with friends was to plan some major mischief/conspiracy; or the project they're working on includes building a weapon/spaceship.

Uhm... I feel like I ran over the question with the last paragraph, but I can't think of a character without considering what they do. In fact, depending on how they act towards certain situations, I can come to like them even if they have traits that I generally dislike.
Reply
:iconemruki:
I think most people consider "realistic" as in how the character reacts to situations. I know many my classmates in high school scoffed at how unrealistically Romeo and Juliet was -- two teens fall so madly in love that they kill themselves because they can't be together, and this all happens in a day. xD

I definitely agree that the characters' environment affects their actions. The "typical environment" that you described seems like a safe but busy one, so people realistically reflect on their busy days that don't really contain any real trauma or conflict, philosophically or politically. This does make for a fairly uninteresting story because it is average life; most people turn to stories to escape this type of monotony.

Most stories have much more interesting environments that force their characters to react in much more interesting ways. Then, we turn to the question: are these reactions "realistic?" Is what they DO realistic, concerning the situation? If the character's situation forces them into a conspiracy plot, does the character's actions seem reasonable, when considering all his options? I think you have the right idea in your last paragraph! Often, if a character remains true to themselves, despite the situation, they are likable characters! They're also realistic because they act accordingly to themselves as well as the situation! C:

I hope that helps with the viewpoint concerning "realistic." "Mary-Sue" has a huge compilation of definitions, but this is the most thorough one I've found: [link]
Reply
:iconk-kaito:
~K-Kaito Jan 21, 2011  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Ah, I see.
Of course, mentally stable people that fall in love-at-first-sight don't go kill themselves in the same day because of it. Nowadays, someone that would do such a thing - because surely they exist - would be drugged in a psychiatry for their own safety.
I haven't read Romeo and Juliet (it's not mandatory, here) so I don't know, but assuming that they didn't show a neurotic and clingy personality beforehand, there should be no reason for their actions. It's a matter of consistency, then.

Thank you, I think I just had a breakthrough and feel rather enlightened. (no, I'm not being sarcastic, I'm just amusing myself)

Also, from what i skimmed through, the original concept of "Mary Sue" really is just 'a character that solves by herself all conflict in an anti-climatic way'. Therefore the idea of "perfect". Any other definitions seem to me like a Hatedom spree.

Anyway~ I'll be looking forward to your new webcomic.
What genre is it going to be?
Reply
:iconemruki:
Yes~ I think that was my point. xD I can be very wordy sometimes, so I apologize for the textwalls. orz

Haha, you're very perceptive!

I'll probably stay in the dark comedy, splash of fantasy settings. It'll be modern this time. It involves a magic linen closet and pacts with devils. C: I hope people will find it interesting.
Reply
:iconk-kaito:
~K-Kaito Jan 25, 2011  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Oh, good luck!~ :D
Reply
:iconsingult:
~Singult Jan 20, 2011  Student Digital Artist
I love characters that have a development! If they're in a longer story, they should not be the same as they were in the beginning. Even short events can be life-changing. As with all things there is a fine line here as well, though.. If a character changes too much, the audience may come to hate his/her "new" personality.

Also, I love characters who are creepy and charming at the same time! Emotionally unstable characters who could pet your head gently, but who can change completely in a split second! The kind who seems really nice at first, but as you get to know them they gradually show their darker sides.
Reply
:iconemruki:
Generally, stories revolve around "life-changing" events, right? So, I think characters should develop, too (unless the writer is trying to make a point of some sort, lol). x) But yes, there definitely needs to be moderation to the change. Remember Death Note; half the fans were so pissed off at Light's new personality, but I thought it was a fair transition between idealistic to corrupt.

Creepy and charming! I love 'em, too! There's something very satisfying about watching their layers peel off to reveal that darker side. >D
Reply
:iconsingult:
~Singult Jan 25, 2011  Student Digital Artist
I have read a couple of stories where the main characters does not seem affected to or attached to the plot.. D: They're just sort of there.
I actually loved Light's transformation. I thought it was really necessary for the plot, and very well executed. He couldn't stay the same "nice" and "good" Light after killing so many people to achieve his goals. But I can see how many fans thought he changed too much, because he had a really big change since the start of the manga.
Reply
:icontrallt:
I like when characters are interesting, have some sort of dream, some sort of struggle/fear, a healthy balance of flaws and good qualities, strengths and weaknesses, and usually some sort of talent or "interest" outside of "I'm a girl in high school and I like boys and hate being different". I like when a character's past is hinted at, but not in-yo-face-SRS BIZNS. Everyone has a struggle/issue whether its love interest, family, peer, personal, or self. One or more of those factors is really what truly affects that character and drives them.

End of net yapping. : )
I love making characters and talking about them.
Reply
:iconemruki:
I feel that many people think the more flaws they give a character, the more interesting they become. Balanced characters are good, and they don't necessarily mean they're uninteresting! :'D The high school girl dilemma doesn't intrigue me because it's so plain... but I feel it could possibly have something interesting behind it...? I'm not sure; the writer would have to really try on that...

<3
Reply
Add a Comment: